L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 1
Academic Vocabulary
Definition · Form · Usage
Unit 1 — Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Name: Date:
Write each word’s part of speech, a definition in English (do not translate), and one academic sentence that shows you understand it.
| Term | Part of Speech | Definition (in English) | Academic Sentence |
|---|
| 1. cosmetic surgery | | | |
| 2. bodily autonomy | | | |
| 3. algorithmic | | | |
| 4. amplification | | | |
| 5. psychological | | | |
| 6. evaluation | | | |
| 7. safeguard | | | |
| 8. normalization | | | |
| 9. adolescence | | | |
| 10. self-esteem | | | |
| 11. body image | | | |
| 12. complications identity | | | |
| 13. vulnerability | | | |
| 14. intervention | | | |
| 15. reconstructive | | | |
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 1
Dictation & Summary
Listen & Write
Unit 1 — Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Name: Score: / 8
Teacher’s Copy — Read these aloud (cover before giving to students):
1. Be Banned for Minors?
2. Should AI Become a Legal Person ?
3. Beauty, Pressure, and Permanence.
4. Plastic surgery has become increasingly common in many countries around the world. Advances in medical.
5. While plastic surgery was once mainly associated with adults, an increasing number of teenagers are now.
6. Supporters of a ban argue that minors are often too young to make permanent decisions about their.
7. Their bodies continue to grow, and their opinions about themselves often change over time. A teenager who.
8. Another major concern involves mental health. Many teenagers face pressure from social media, celebrities, influencers.
9. Supporters of a ban also worry about medical risks. Although many cosmetic procedures are generally safe, every surgery.
10. However, opponents of a ban argue that minors and their families should have the freedom to make personal medical.
Listen carefully and write each sentence exactly. Check capital letters and punctuation.
Summarize the passage in ONE sentence
Use your own words. Do not copy a sentence from the passage.
Two key terms you heard, and why they matter
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 1
Argument Builder
Claim · Evidence · Rebuttal
Unit 1 — Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
My side: FORAGAINST (circle one)
1. Claim — state your position in one sentence
2. Reason A + Evidence
Give a reason, then support it with a fact, example, or statistic.
From the textbook: Teenagers are still physically developing. / Minors may make impulsive decisions. / Social media creates unrealistic beauty standards. / Cosmetic surgery carries medical risks.
4. Counterargument — what would the other side say?
From the textbook: Families should have freedom of choice. / Some procedures improve confidence. / Certain surgeries address medical problems. / Parents and doctors can guide decisions.
5. Rebuttal — why is your side still stronger?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 1
Essay Outline
Plan Before You Write
Unit 1 — Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Name: Date:
Topic: Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Plan the whole essay here first. Write in note form — full sentences only for the thesis.
Hook
A question, a surprising fact, or a short scene.
Background
What does the reader need to know before your argument?
Thesis
One full sentence stating your position and your two main reasons.
Body 1
Topic sentence → evidence → explanation.
Counter
The strongest objection to your view.
Rebuttal
Answer the objection without repeating your thesis.
Conclusion
So what? Why does this matter beyond the classroom?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 1
Debate Flow Sheet
Team Debate — Listen, Note & Respond
Unit 1 — Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
My team:Team A Team BMy side:FOR (agree) AGAINST (disagree)My role:1st 2nd 3rd speaker
1. Our constructive — say it FROM MEMORY, then write it here
Assertion → Reasoning → Evidence. No peeking at the book.
✍ THEY said… (listening notes)
↪ WE answer… (rebuttal plan)
2. P.O.I. — one sharp question to interrupt with
3. Closing — crystallize: why our side wins, in two sentences
Teacher check — spoke from memory:Yes AlmostBest moment today:
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 1
Memory & Delivery Check
Write the debate sentences from memory
Unit 1 — Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Name: Score: / 10
Motion: Should Plastic Surgery Be Banned for Minors?
Close your book. Write the sentences you memorized exactly. Then read them aloud to your teacher.
1️⃣ My full argument (Assertion – Reasoning – Evidence)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2️⃣ My rebuttal sentence
6.
7.
3️⃣ Delivery — how did you say it?
| Skill | What we look for | Me | Teacher |
|---|
| Memory | Every sentence said without looking | / 3 | / 3 |
| Voice | Loud, clear, good pace | / 2 | / 2 |
| Eye contact | Looking at the audience, not the paper | / 2 | / 2 |
| Confidence | Standing tall, no long pauses | / 3 | / 3 |
Teacher signature: Practice again at home:Yes No need!
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 2
Academic Vocabulary
Definition · Form · Usage
Unit 2 — Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Name: Date:
Write each word’s part of speech, a definition in English (do not translate), and one academic sentence that shows you understand it.
| Term | Part of Speech | Definition (in English) | Academic Sentence |
|---|
| 1. facial recognition | | | |
| 2. biometric data | | | |
| 3. mass surveillance | | | |
| 4. civil liberties | | | |
| 5. misidentification | | | |
| 6. algorithmic bias | | | |
| 7. consent | | | |
| 8. safeguard | | | |
| 9. deterrence | | | |
| 10. accountability | | | |
| 11. -privacy | | | |
| 12. regulation | | | |
| 13. discrimination | | | |
| 14. transparency | | | |
| 15. enforcement | | | |
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 2
Dictation & Summary
Listen & Write
Unit 2 — Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Name: Score: / 8
Teacher’s Copy — Read these aloud (cover before giving to students):
1. Should Facial Recognition Technology.
2. Be Banned in Public Spaces?
3. Be Banned in Public Spaces.
4. Privacy in Plain Sight.
5. Facial recognition technology has rapidly become one of the most controversial technological.
6. Supporters argue that facial recognition technology can significantly improve public safety. Law.
7. Another advantage is efficiency. Facial recognition systems can process large amounts of information.
8. Businesses also use facial recognition for security and convenience. Some companies employ facial.
9. However, critics argue that facial recognition poses significant risks to privacy. Unlike passwords or.
10. Another major concern involves mass surveillance. Critics warn that facial recognition systems could.
Listen carefully and write each sentence exactly. Check capital letters and punctuation.
Summarize the passage in ONE sentence
Use your own words. Do not copy a sentence from the passage.
Two key terms you heard, and why they matter
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 2
Argument Builder
Claim · Evidence · Rebuttal
Unit 2 — Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
My side: FORAGAINST (circle one)
1. Claim — state your position in one sentence
2. Reason A + Evidence
Give a reason, then support it with a fact, example, or statistic.
From the textbook: Improve public safety. ( ». / Help identify criminals quickly. / Prevent terrorism and serious crimes. / Increase law enforcement efficiency.
4. Counterargument — what would the other side say?
From the textbook: Violates privacy rights. / Enables mass surveillance. / Risks government abuse. / May contain algorithmic bias.
5. Rebuttal — why is your side still stronger?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 2
Essay Outline
Plan Before You Write
Unit 2 — Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Name: Date:
Topic: Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Plan the whole essay here first. Write in note form — full sentences only for the thesis.
Hook
A question, a surprising fact, or a short scene.
Background
What does the reader need to know before your argument?
Thesis
One full sentence stating your position and your two main reasons.
Body 1
Topic sentence → evidence → explanation.
Counter
The strongest objection to your view.
Rebuttal
Answer the objection without repeating your thesis.
Conclusion
So what? Why does this matter beyond the classroom?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 2
Debate Flow Sheet
Team Debate — Listen, Note & Respond
Unit 2 — Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
My team:Team A Team BMy side:FOR (agree) AGAINST (disagree)My role:1st 2nd 3rd speaker
1. Our constructive — say it FROM MEMORY, then write it here
Assertion → Reasoning → Evidence. No peeking at the book.
✍ THEY said… (listening notes)
↪ WE answer… (rebuttal plan)
2. P.O.I. — one sharp question to interrupt with
3. Closing — crystallize: why our side wins, in two sentences
Teacher check — spoke from memory:Yes AlmostBest moment today:
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 2
Memory & Delivery Check
Write the debate sentences from memory
Unit 2 — Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Name: Score: / 10
Motion: Should Facial Recognition Technology Be Banned in Public Spaces?
Close your book. Write the sentences you memorized exactly. Then read them aloud to your teacher.
1️⃣ My full argument (Assertion – Reasoning – Evidence)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2️⃣ My rebuttal sentence
6.
7.
3️⃣ Delivery — how did you say it?
| Skill | What we look for | Me | Teacher |
|---|
| Memory | Every sentence said without looking | / 3 | / 3 |
| Voice | Loud, clear, good pace | / 2 | / 2 |
| Eye contact | Looking at the audience, not the paper | / 2 | / 2 |
| Confidence | Standing tall, no long pauses | / 3 | / 3 |
Teacher signature: Practice again at home:Yes No need!
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 3
Academic Vocabulary
Definition · Form · Usage
Unit 3 — Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Name: Date:
Write each word’s part of speech, a definition in English (do not translate), and one academic sentence that shows you understand it.
| Term | Part of Speech | Definition (in English) | Academic Sentence |
|---|
| 1. technological | | | |
| 2. spillover | | | |
| 3. orbital debris | | | |
| 4. democratization | | | |
| 5. false dichotomy | | | |
| 6. sovereignty | | | |
| 7. sustainability | | | |
| 8. terrestrial | | | |
| 9. innovation | | | |
| 10. inequality | | | |
| 11. governance | | | |
| 12. regulation | | | |
| 13. privatization | | | |
| 14. investment | | | |
| 15. exploration | | | |
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 3
Dictation & Summary
Listen & Write
Unit 3 — Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Name: Score: / 8
Teacher’s Copy — Read these aloud (cover before giving to students):
1. Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested.
2. Fix Earth Before Leaving It.
3. Nib e DAR eee I me my: Be I 4.
4. In recent decades, governments and private organizations have invested billions of dollars in space.
5. Supporters of space exploration argue that it brings long-term benefits that often go unnoticed. Technologies developed.
6. Another key argument is that space exploration is essential for the future survival of humanity. Some scientists warn.
7. However, critics argue that the immediate needs of people on Earth should take priority. Millions of people around the.
8. Another concern is that the benefits of space exploration are not equally shared. Wealthy nations and private.
9. The history of technological innovation driven by space exploration provides compelling evidence that investments in.
10. The democratization of space exploration through the rise of commercial space companies has significantly altered the.
Listen carefully and write each sentence exactly. Check capital letters and punctuation.
Summarize the passage in ONE sentence
Use your own words. Do not copy a sentence from the passage.
Two key terms you heard, and why they matter
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 3
Argument Builder
Claim · Evidence · Rebuttal
Unit 3 — Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
My side: FORAGAINST (circle one)
1. Claim — state your position in one sentence
2. Reason A + Evidence
Give a reason, then support it with a fact, example, or statistic.
From the textbook: Poverty remains widespread. / Healthcare needs immediate funding. / Climate change requires urgent action. / Education improves long-term development.
4. Counterargument — what would the other side say?
From the textbook: Space exploration drives innovation. / Satellite technology benefits daily life. ¢. / Humanity needs long-term survival strategies. / Space programs inspire future scientists.
5. Rebuttal — why is your side still stronger?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 3
Essay Outline
Plan Before You Write
Unit 3 — Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Name: Date:
Topic: Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Plan the whole essay here first. Write in note form — full sentences only for the thesis.
Hook
A question, a surprising fact, or a short scene.
Background
What does the reader need to know before your argument?
Thesis
One full sentence stating your position and your two main reasons.
Body 1
Topic sentence → evidence → explanation.
Counter
The strongest objection to your view.
Rebuttal
Answer the objection without repeating your thesis.
Conclusion
So what? Why does this matter beyond the classroom?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 3
Debate Flow Sheet
Team Debate — Listen, Note & Respond
Unit 3 — Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
My team:Team A Team BMy side:FOR (agree) AGAINST (disagree)My role:1st 2nd 3rd speaker
1. Our constructive — say it FROM MEMORY, then write it here
Assertion → Reasoning → Evidence. No peeking at the book.
✍ THEY said… (listening notes)
↪ WE answer… (rebuttal plan)
2. P.O.I. — one sharp question to interrupt with
3. Closing — crystallize: why our side wins, in two sentences
Teacher check — spoke from memory:Yes AlmostBest moment today:
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 3
Memory & Delivery Check
Write the debate sentences from memory
Unit 3 — Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Name: Score: / 10
Motion: Should Space Exploration Budgets Be Invested in Solving Problems on Earth First?
Close your book. Write the sentences you memorized exactly. Then read them aloud to your teacher.
1️⃣ My full argument (Assertion – Reasoning – Evidence)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2️⃣ My rebuttal sentence
6.
7.
3️⃣ Delivery — how did you say it?
| Skill | What we look for | Me | Teacher |
|---|
| Memory | Every sentence said without looking | / 3 | / 3 |
| Voice | Loud, clear, good pace | / 2 | / 2 |
| Eye contact | Looking at the audience, not the paper | / 2 | / 2 |
| Confidence | Standing tall, no long pauses | / 3 | / 3 |
Teacher signature: Practice again at home:Yes No need!
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 4
Academic Vocabulary
Definition · Form · Usage
Unit 4 — Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Name: Date:
Write each word’s part of speech, a definition in English (do not translate), and one academic sentence that shows you understand it.
| Term | Part of Speech | Definition (in English) | Academic Sentence |
|---|
| 1. hate speech | | | |
| 2. harm principle | | | |
| 3. incitement | | | |
| 4. civil liberties | | | |
| 5. regulatory | | | |
| 6. overreach | | | |
| 7. media literacy | | | |
| 8. vulnerable | | | |
| 9. communities | | | |
| 10. authoritarianism | | | |
| 11. censorship | | | |
| 12. discrimination | | | |
| 13. accountability | | | |
| 14. regulation | | | |
| 15. suppression | | | |
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 4
Dictation & Summary
Listen & Write
Unit 4 — Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Name: Score: / 8
Teacher’s Copy — Read these aloud (cover before giving to students):
1. Should Freedom of Speech Have.
2. No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
3. The Line Between Speech and Harm.
4. Freedom of speech is widely considered one of the most important rights in a democratic society. It.
5. Supporters of absolute free speech argue that any restriction on expression can be dangerous. They.
6. On the other hand, critics argue that hate speech is not simply an opinion but a form of harm. Hate speech targets.
7. Additionally, critics argue that freedom of speech should come with responsibility. Rights are not unlimited, especially.
8. The philosophical tradition of liberalism which provides the foundational justification for freedom of speech in.
9. John Stuart Mill's harm principle, one of the most influential arguments for freedom of expression, holds that liberty.
10. The empirical evidence on the real-world consequences of hate speech for its targets challenges the assumption that.
Listen carefully and write each sentence exactly. Check capital letters and punctuation.
Summarize the passage in ONE sentence
Use your own words. Do not copy a sentence from the passage.
Two key terms you heard, and why they matter
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 4
Argument Builder
Claim · Evidence · Rebuttal
Unit 4 — Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
My side: FORAGAINST (circle one)
1. Claim — state your position in one sentence
2. Reason A + Evidence
Give a reason, then support it with a fact, example, or statistic.
From the textbook: Free speech protects democracy. / Governments may abuse censorship powers. / People should be allowed to express unpopular opinions. / Open debate helps expose harmful ideas.
4. Counterargument — what would the other side say?
From the textbook: Hate speech can cause real harm. / Vulnerable groups deserve protection. / Speech can encourage violence and discrimination. / Rights come with responsibilities.
5. Rebuttal — why is your side still stronger?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 4
Essay Outline
Plan Before You Write
Unit 4 — Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Name: Date:
Topic: Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Plan the whole essay here first. Write in note form — full sentences only for the thesis.
Hook
A question, a surprising fact, or a short scene.
Background
What does the reader need to know before your argument?
Thesis
One full sentence stating your position and your two main reasons.
Body 1
Topic sentence → evidence → explanation.
Counter
The strongest objection to your view.
Rebuttal
Answer the objection without repeating your thesis.
Conclusion
So what? Why does this matter beyond the classroom?
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 4
Debate Flow Sheet
Team Debate — Listen, Note & Respond
Unit 4 — Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Name: Date:
Motion: Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
My team:Team A Team BMy side:FOR (agree) AGAINST (disagree)My role:1st 2nd 3rd speaker
1. Our constructive — say it FROM MEMORY, then write it here
Assertion → Reasoning → Evidence. No peeking at the book.
✍ THEY said… (listening notes)
↪ WE answer… (rebuttal plan)
2. P.O.I. — one sharp question to interrupt with
3. Closing — crystallize: why our side wins, in two sentences
Teacher check — spoke from memory:Yes AlmostBest moment today:
L E V E L 9 · B O O K 4 · U N I T 4
Memory & Delivery Check
Write the debate sentences from memory
Unit 4 — Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Name: Score: / 10
Motion: Should Freedom of Speech Have No Exceptions, Even for Hate Speech?
Close your book. Write the sentences you memorized exactly. Then read them aloud to your teacher.
1️⃣ My full argument (Assertion – Reasoning – Evidence)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2️⃣ My rebuttal sentence
6.
7.
3️⃣ Delivery — how did you say it?
| Skill | What we look for | Me | Teacher |
|---|
| Memory | Every sentence said without looking | / 3 | / 3 |
| Voice | Loud, clear, good pace | / 2 | / 2 |
| Eye contact | Looking at the audience, not the paper | / 2 | / 2 |
| Confidence | Standing tall, no long pauses | / 3 | / 3 |
Teacher signature: Practice again at home:Yes No need!